Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Andreas Siljestrom vs Cem Ilkel Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Siljestrom vs Ilkel analysis and find out who is favored!
Andreas Siljestrom vs Cem Ilkel Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Siljestrom 1 - 0 Ilkel
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Siljestrom has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Ilkel has won 46.71%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Siljestrom, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Ilkel has won 51.64%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 25.54% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Siljestrom has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Ilkel has saved 51.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Siljestrom has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Ilkel winning 40% (W/L 20/ 30) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Siljestrom has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 2/ 2), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 25% (W/L 7/ 21). Ilkel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 61% (W/L 255/ 166), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 10% (W/L 1/ 9).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Siljestrom winning 1 times and Ilkel being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Siljestrom winning 2 and Ilkel winning 1. The last match between Siljestrom and Ilkel was at the Istanbul Challenger, 13-09-2015, Q1 round, Hard with Andreas Siljestrom getting the victory 7-6(1) 3-6 7-5.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:56:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Siljestrom and Ilkel have played a deciding set 1 times, with Siljestrom winning 1 times and Ilkel 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Siljestrom winning 1, and Ilkel 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Siljestrom has played against opponents with an average rank of while Ilkel has played against players with an average rank of 224.26.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Siljestrom has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Ilkel has won 55% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Siljestrom has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Ilkel has converted 40.43% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Ret.
Rank
High
42
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
412
Rank
144
High
28
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
29% (23-57)
Career Total W/L
56% (401-313)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
39% (9-14)
$650
Career Prize Money
$225,530
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Siljestrom VS Ilkel H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Andreas Siljestrom | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 17 | 17 |
| Aces (Total) | 11 | 6 |
| DFs (Total) | 15 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:56:11 | 1:56:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 55% (58/105) | 60% (58/96) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 79% (46/58) | 76% (44/58) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 49% (23/47) | 55% (21/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 60% (3/5) | 33% (3/9) |
| Return Points W% | 32% (31/96) | 34% (36/105) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Siljestrom VS Ilkel H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(1) 3-6 7-5 |
Stats 
Andreas Siljestrom
Player
Cem Ilkel
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
11
Aces
6
15
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Andreas Siljestrom | Cem Ilkel |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 39% (9/14) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 39% (20/31) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 45% (208/257) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 33% (4/8) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 45% (5/6) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.5 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 113 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.23 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 51 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:29:54 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 171.04 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 57% (805/1413) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 70% (566/805) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 47% (284/608) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 40% (38/94) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (479/1345) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 47% (7/8) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 29% (2/5) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 36% (8/22) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 83% (5/6) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (3/6) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 70% (10/7) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 30% (10/3) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 15% (13/2) |
Andreas Siljestrom Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
N.Sriram Balaji
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
72%
(
42 of
58)
1st Serve %
70%
(
44 of
63)
5
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
6
83%
(
35 of
42)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
22%
(
13 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
24 of
63)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sebastian Prechtel
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
64%
(
50 of
78)
1st Serve %
60%
(
41 of
68)
5
Aces
6
5
Double Faults
5
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
50%
(
14 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
7 of
27)
70%
(
7 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
30 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
36 of
68)
84
Total Points Won
62
|
4-6 6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Marek Jaloviec
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
54%
(
25 of
46)
1st Serve %
65%
(
41 of
63)
5
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
80%
(
20 of
25)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
76%
(
16 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
12 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
27 of
63)
63
Total Points Won
46
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Siljestrom
Player
Rafal Teurer
58%
(
42 of
72)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
6
Aces
0
6
Double Faults
6
79%
(
33 of
42)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
33 of
53)
37%
(
11 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
39%
(
28 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
37 of
83)
81
Total Points Won
74
|
6-3 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Petru-Alexandru Luncanu
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
66%
(
40 of
61)
1st Serve %
71%
(
37 of
52)
2
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
2
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
29 of
37)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
16 of
52)
59
Total Points Won
54
|
4-6 6-3 ret. | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Siljestrom
Player
Shalva Dzhanashia
61%
(
41 of
67)
1st Serve %
72%
(
51 of
71)
14
Aces
2
5
Double Faults
6
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
50%
(
13 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
29%
(
5 of
17)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
26 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
37 of
71)
78
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Andrei Vasilevski
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
58%
(
60 of
104)
1st Serve %
52%
(
64 of
123)
9
Aces
10
4
Double Faults
9
73%
(
44 of
60)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
45 of
64)
48%
(
21 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
38%
(
39 of
104)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
52 of
123)
117
Total Points Won
110
|
3-6 6-3 7-6(1) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Andreas Siljestrom
Player
Cem Ilkel
55%
(
58 of
105)
1st Serve %
60%
(
58 of
96)
11
Aces
6
15
Double Faults
4
79%
(
46 of
58)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
49%
(
23 of
47)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
34%
(
36 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
31 of
96)
100
Total Points Won
101
|
7-6(1) 3-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mico Santiago
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
56%
(
28 of
50)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve Won
75%
(
21 of
28)
58%
(
19 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
34%
(
24 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
22 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-0 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Patrik Rosenholm
Player
Andreas Siljestrom
44%
(
30 of
68)
1st Serve %
55%
(
49 of
89)
1
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
11
87%
(
26 of
30)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
37 of
49)
61%
(
23 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
16 of
40)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
28%
(
19 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
36 of
89)
85
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
view more
Cem Ilkel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Altug Celikbilek
Player
Cem Ilkel
72%
(
63 of
88)
1st Serve %
50%
(
57 of
113)
7
Aces
11
2
Double Faults
4
79%
(
50 of
63)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
27 of
56)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
27 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
47 of
113)
108
Total Points Won
93
|
6-7(5) 6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aleksandre Bakshi
Player
Cem Ilkel
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
1
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
30 of
68)
64
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Emile Hudd
Player
Cem Ilkel
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
13 of
24)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Joe Tyler
64%
(
38 of
59)
1st Serve %
75%
(
46 of
61)
3
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
0
76%
(
29 of
38)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
71%
(
15 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
60%
(
9 of
15)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
15 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
24 of
61)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Ali Habib
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
32 of
56)
4
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
0
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
44%
(
11 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
12 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
42%
(
27 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
63
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matthew Hulme
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
50 of
70)
1st Serve %
66%
(
49 of
74)
11
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
2
74%
(
37 of
50)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
34 of
49)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
68
|
1-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Petr Nesterov
Player
Cem Ilkel
71%
(
36 of
51)
1st Serve %
51%
(
23 of
45)
9
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
3
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
17 of
23)
67%
(
10 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
24%
(
12 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
18 of
45)
57
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Cem Ilkel
Player
Yousef Khamis
47%
(
34 of
72)
1st Serve %
61%
(
39 of
64)
9
Aces
9
8
Double Faults
5
82%
(
28 of
34)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
12 of
25)
100%
(
3 of
3)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
35%
(
25 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
25 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Michael Agwi
Player
Cem Ilkel
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
48%
(
19 of
40)
5
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
30%
(
13 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
24 of
40)
55
Total Points Won
29
|
6-0 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Otto Virtanen
Player
Cem Ilkel
62%
(
21 of
34)
1st Serve %
60%
(
28 of
47)
11
Aces
1
6
Double Faults
3
100%
(
21 of
21)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
38%
(
5 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
21%
(
4 of
19)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
24%
(
8 of
34)
Rtn Points Won
60%
(
28 of
47)
54
Total Points Won
27
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Siljestrom Vs Ilkel Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
